<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Useless information</title>
	<atom:link href="http://uselessinfo.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://uselessinfo.wordpress.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 21:36:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Karen Armstrong @ the Oxford Literary Festival by A Free Spirit</title>
		<link>http://uselessinfo.wordpress.com/2008/04/11/karen-armstrong-the-oxford-literary-festival/#comment-995</link>
		<dc:creator>A Free Spirit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 21:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uselessinfo.wordpress.com/?p=108#comment-995</guid>
		<description>Really interesting! Armstrong’s particular theory comes through in her introduction to A Case for God.  In my view, she comes very close to reducing religion to ethics, which is something liberal Protestantism has been criticized for doing.   Take, for example, &quot;God is love.&quot;   I interpret this as teaching that love is the source or basis of existence.  Even though our acts of love (and feelings!...which Armstrong also discounts relative to conduct) involve &quot;God is love&quot; being actualized, there is also the sense irrespective of one&#039;s conduct that existence itself is love.  I take the transcendent wisdom of the latter to be just as important as conduct in religious terms.   I’ve just posted a critique (http://deligentia.wordpress.com/2009/10/10/a-case-for-god/).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really interesting! Armstrong’s particular theory comes through in her introduction to A Case for God.  In my view, she comes very close to reducing religion to ethics, which is something liberal Protestantism has been criticized for doing.   Take, for example, &#8220;God is love.&#8221;   I interpret this as teaching that love is the source or basis of existence.  Even though our acts of love (and feelings!&#8230;which Armstrong also discounts relative to conduct) involve &#8220;God is love&#8221; being actualized, there is also the sense irrespective of one&#8217;s conduct that existence itself is love.  I take the transcendent wisdom of the latter to be just as important as conduct in religious terms.   I’ve just posted a critique (<a href="http://deligentia.wordpress.com/2009/10/10/a-case-for-god/)" rel="nofollow">http://deligentia.wordpress.com/2009/10/10/a-case-for-god/)</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Reading List by Emma</title>
		<link>http://uselessinfo.wordpress.com/2008/07/19/reading-list/#comment-963</link>
		<dc:creator>Emma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uselessinfo.wordpress.com/?p=179#comment-963</guid>
		<description>ooops...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ooops&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Reading List by Laura</title>
		<link>http://uselessinfo.wordpress.com/2008/07/19/reading-list/#comment-962</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 07:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uselessinfo.wordpress.com/?p=179#comment-962</guid>
		<description>You haven&#039;t underlined any - does this mean you didn&#039;t love any of them?
(Thinks: could you underline one you haven&#039;t yet read?  That would be very Time Traveler&#039;s Wife...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You haven&#8217;t underlined any &#8211; does this mean you didn&#8217;t love any of them?<br />
(Thinks: could you underline one you haven&#8217;t yet read?  That would be very Time Traveler&#8217;s Wife&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Equal Opportunities by Laura</title>
		<link>http://uselessinfo.wordpress.com/2008/05/28/equal-opportunities/#comment-954</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 08:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uselessinfo.wordpress.com/?p=114#comment-954</guid>
		<description>Beautifully timed to coincide with: http://stuffwhitepeoplelike.wordpress.com/2008/05/28/101-being-offended/
xx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beautifully timed to coincide with: <a href="http://stuffwhitepeoplelike.wordpress.com/2008/05/28/101-being-offended/" rel="nofollow">http://stuffwhitepeoplelike.wordpress.com/2008/05/28/101-being-offended/</a><br />
xx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on East coast road trip by Tim</title>
		<link>http://uselessinfo.wordpress.com/2008/05/09/east-coast-road-trip/#comment-953</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 20:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uselessinfo.wordpress.com/?p=113#comment-953</guid>
		<description>Pay for postage on-line.  National Postal Museum.  There is an emerging fixation here.  Stamp on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pay for postage on-line.  National Postal Museum.  There is an emerging fixation here.  Stamp on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
